CLAIM AGAINST GECA, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSURANCE AND PETAR JOHNSON-PROGRESS REPORT 4
Claim against GECA, Environmental Assurance and Petar Johnson
Progress Report 4. Dated 06.10.2009
GECA, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSURANCE AND PETAR JOHNSON'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ACCEPT THAT INSTYLE'S CLAIMS ARE LEGITIMATE
GECA and Environmental Assurance have made public statements suggesting that INSTYLE's claims in its Federal Court case are "misconceived", and that INSTYLE's action in bringing its claims is unlawful.
On the last occasion this matter was before the Court on 9 September, 2009, GECA's, Environmental Assurance's and Petar Johnson's barrister made the following statement -
"There is no challenge being made to the fact that ... the applicant's (INSTYLE's) case meets the threshold of reasonable prospects of success".
INSTYLE will seek to have the case heard by the Court as a matter of urgency.
Progress Report 4. Dated 06.10.2009
GECA, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSURANCE AND PETAR JOHNSON'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ACCEPT THAT INSTYLE'S CLAIMS ARE LEGITIMATE
GECA and Environmental Assurance have made public statements suggesting that INSTYLE's claims in its Federal Court case are "misconceived", and that INSTYLE's action in bringing its claims is unlawful.
On the last occasion this matter was before the Court on 9 September, 2009, GECA's, Environmental Assurance's and Petar Johnson's barrister made the following statement -
"There is no challenge being made to the fact that ... the applicant's (INSTYLE's) case meets the threshold of reasonable prospects of success".
INSTYLE will seek to have the case heard by the Court as a matter of urgency.